Skip navigation

Renasight Case Studies

Discover how Renasight™ delivers meaningful utility and is revolutionizing patient management through genetic insights. Explore real-world case examples demonstrating improved diagnostics, personalized treatment plans, and enhanced patient care.

Case Study 1: Family History & Patients of African Ancestry- APOL1

Clinical History and Demographics

Patient history

  • Recent lab work showed decreased kidney function prompting a nephrology referral for further evaluation
  • Urinalysis showed proteinuria that will be monitored
  • Diagnosed with CKD stage 2-3
  • Patient has a sibling who is on dialysis
  • No other family history of renal disease
  • Children who have no known kidney concerns

Rationale for genetic test

  • Clarify etiology of proteinuria/CKD
  • First degree relative with CKD
  • Variability in severity within the family
  • Assess appropriateness of therapies
  • Counsel on likelihood of disease progression
The above clinical information is not specific to any particular patient. Photo shown is a stock image not a real patient

Renasight™ Result – APOL1

alt text

APOL1-Mediated Kidney Disease (AMKD)

Inheritance : Autosomal Recessive/ Complex

Incidence : 13% of African-Americans carry two risk alleles.

What is it : A risk factor to develop focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and kidney failure

  • Individuals with two APOL1 risk alleles have a 7- to 30-fold increased risk of developing kidney disease.
  • Lifetime risk of ESRD for high risk individuals may be up to 15%.

APOL1-Mediated Kidney Disease (AMKD): Clinical Utility

Identifies etiologic factor of proteinuria/CKD

Can predict accelerated progression of CKD

APOL1 status can inform need for future biopsy

Informs recurrence risk should patient require transplantation

Consider clinical trial opportunities

Enables patient to benefit from advances in targeted therapies to delay disease progression

Informs risk to relatives

Should transplant be needed, APOL1 testing in living related candidates can be considered

Case Study 2: FSGS – Alport syndrome

Clinical Diagnoses with Genetic Origins

Patient history

  • Male patient found to have hematuria at a routine visit with his primary physician as a young adult and referred to nephrology
  • Persistent proteinuria developed leading to a renal biopsy that showed FSGS
  • CKD stage 4 in his 40s
  • Maternal grandfather and a great aunt with history of ESRD

Rationale for genetic test

  • Clarify etiology of proteinuria and FSGS
  • Maternal family history of disease
  • Assess appropriateness of therapies
  • Counsel on likelihood of disease progression
The above clinical information is not specific to any particular patient. Photo shown is a stock image not a real patient

Renasight™ Result – COL4A5

alt text

X-linked Alport Syndrome: Clinical Utility

Identified cause for proteinuria, CKD and FSGS

Informed risk for progression to ESRD

Identified risk for hearing and vision deficits

Informed on decision to biopsy

Low recurrence risk should patient require transplantation

Begin treatment with RAAS blockade as guidelines advise

Avoided immunosuppression trials

Identification of at-risk relatives

Informed family planning/ reproductive testing options

  • Genetic testing is more sensitive and specific than kidney biopsy and is recommended as the gold standard
  • When Alport syndrome is suspected, NGS can identify up to 95% of pathogenic COL4A- variants
  • Genetic testing is recommended in patients with:
    • First degree relative with a COL4A3-COL4A5 variant – this especially includes potential donors
    • Persistent hematuria >6 months
    • Persistent proteinuria, SRNS, or biopsy-proven FSGS
    • Kidney failure without an obvious cause
    • Familial IgA glomerulonephritis

Phenotypic spectrum of Alport syndrome

alt text
Adapted from Miner JH. Kidney Int. 2014. 86(6): 1081-3.

Case Study 3: Hypertension – UMOD

Unknown/Unclear Cause of CKD

Patient history

  • CKD stage 4 attributed to hypertension and NSAID use
  • History of gout
  • Sibling with renal cysts; no known renal dysfunction
  • Father had renal transplant in his 40s
  • Another paternal family member had history of ESRD

Rationale for genetic test

  • Clarify etiology of CKD
  • Several relatives with CKD
  • Intrafamilial variability in presentation of CKD
  • Assess appropriateness of therapies
  • Counsel on likelihood of disease progression
The above clinical information is not specific to any particular patient. Photo shown is a stock image not a real patient

Renasight™ Result – UMOD

alt text

KDIGO Consensus Report on ADTKD

Autosomal Dominant Tubulointerstitial Kidney Disease.

ADTKD (all subtypes)

Table 2 | Usual clinical findings in patients with ADTKD


  • Autosomal dominant inheritance
  • Progressive loss of kidney function
  • Bland urinary sediment
  • Absent-to-mild albuminuria/proteinuria
  • No severe hypertension during early stages
  • No drug exposure potentially causing tubulointerstitial nephritis
  • Normal or small-sized kidneys on ultrasound
  • Nocturia or enuresis in children (owing to loss of renal concentration ability)

Table 3 | Usual findings on renal history in patients with ADTKD


  • Interstitial fibrosis
  • Tubular atrophy
  • Thickening and lamellation of tubular basement membranes
  • Possibly tubular dilation (microcysts)
  • Negative immunofluorescence for complement and immunoglobulins

 

"Genetic testing is currently the only way to definitively prove ADTKD and its respective subtypes, and exclude the disease in affected family members"

UMOD
Genetics:
  • UMOD gene accounts for 70% of ADTKD
  • Usually inherited (de novo is rare)

Clinical features:
  • Hyperuricemia, low fractional urate excretion (<5%)
  • Early gout for age
  • Occasional renal cysts
  • Average age of ESRD is 54 yrs (25-70 yrs)
  • Intrafamilial variability

Treatment:
  • Allopurinol or febuxostat treats gout and hyperuricemia
  • No specific renal treatment BUT successful transplant from unaffected donor is considered a cure

UMOD-related disease: Clinical Utility

Reclassified etiology from HTN/NSAID to one originating from the UMOD gene

Explained the history of gout

Identify risk for progression to ESRD

Inform on decision to biopsy since cause was identified and histologic findings are often nonspecific

Renal transplant from unaffected donor is considered a cure

Identification of at-risk family members with a 50% recurrence risk

Definitive test for related, eligible donor candidates

Case Study 4: Transplant Candidate Informing Donor Eligibility

Transplant candidate with cystic disease

Patient history

  • CKD stage 5, renal cysts, hypertension
  • Diagnosed with ADPKD
  • Family history unknown

Rationale for genetic test

  • Clarify etiology of CKD
  • Assess appropriateness of therapies
  • Anticipate pre and post transplant course
The above clinical information is not specific to any particular patient. Photo shown is a stock image not a real patient

Renasight™ Result – HNF1B

alt text

Phenotypic spectrum of HNF1B-related ADTKD

  • Formerly referred to as Renal Cysts and Diabetes syndrome
  • Most common known monogenic cause of developmental renal disease
  • Strong intrafamilial variability
  • Can manifest in prenatal period (agenesis/hypoplasia)
  • Cystic disease in 73%
  • Diabetes develops in ~50%
  • Electrolyte abnormalities
    • Hypomagnesemia, hyperuricemia (gout)
  • 50% risk to children
alt text

HNF1B-related disease: Clinical Utility

Inform on treatment given nonclassic form of PKD

Identify risk for multiple extra-renal features

Increased risk of new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT), IS regimen that avoids tacrolimus and reduces corticosteroid exposure

Identification of at-risk family members given 50% risk of recurrence

Test available for eligible donor candidates in which intrafamilial variability is common

Please use the form to submit a case study you would like to share

Thank you for your interest in sharing your case example with us. We kindly ask that you only submit case examples that are de-identified in a manner to ensure no protected health information (PHI) is contained therein. By submitting the case example, you acknowledge Natera may choose to use the de-identified case example in marketing communications such as emails, presentations, various marketing materials, and on other external-facing platforms.

Please share your contact details. This will enable us to reach out to you if we have any questions about the information you've provided.

Case Example Information: Please complete the following section regarding your case example

i.e. current symptoms, current diagnosis, family history, etc.
Positive and for what gene, negative, VUS, etc.

Natera would like to send you information about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. By submitting your information you are agreeing to Natera's terms of use and privacy policy.

icon-angle icon-bars icon-times